Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 462
Filter
2.
Med Mycol ; 61(6)2023 Jun 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20243898

ABSTRACT

Patients with severe COVID-19 are at increased risk for invasive fungal infections, which are underestimated. Histoplasmosis reactivation in endemic areas should not be overlooked in this population. In a previous study, seroconversion to anti-histoplasmin antibodies by ELISA was detected in 6/39 (15.4%) patients with severe COVID-19. In this work, samples were further investigated to detect seroconversion to antibodies against the Histoplasma capsulatum 100-kDa antigen (Hcp100) by ELISA. Seroconversion to anti-Hcp100 antibodies was detected in 7/39 patients, of whom 6 also seroconverted anti-histoplasmin antibodies. These results reinforce previous findings that show histoplasmosis as an underdiagnosed fungal entity complicating COVID-19.


This study verifies that patients with severe COVID-19 at intensive care units are at risk for histoplasmosis reactivation in endemic areas. Accurate diagnosis of this deadly fungal disease among critically ill patients with COVID-19 living in endemic areas for histoplasmosis is needed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Histoplasmosis , Animals , Histoplasmosis/diagnosis , Histoplasmosis/epidemiology , Histoplasmosis/microbiology , Histoplasmosis/veterinary , Histoplasmin , Histoplasma , Critical Illness , Antibodies, Fungal , COVID-19/veterinary , Antigens, Fungal
3.
Epidemiol Infect ; 151: e96, 2023 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20238550

ABSTRACT

The recent reinforcement of CoV surveillance in animals fuelled by the COVID-19 pandemic provided increasing evidence that mammals other than bats might hide further diversity and play critical roles in human infectious diseases. This work describes the results of a two-year survey carried out in Italy with the double objective of uncovering CoV diversity associated with wildlife and of excluding the establishment of a reservoir for SARS-CoV-2 in particularly susceptible or exposed species. The survey targeted hosts from five different orders and was harmonised across the country in terms of sample size, target tissues, and molecular test. Results showed the circulation of 8 CoV species in 13 hosts out of the 42 screened. Coronaviruses were either typical of the host species/genus or normally associated with their domestic counterpart. Two novel viruses likely belonging to a novel CoV genus were found in mustelids. All samples were negative for SARS-CoV-2, with minimum detectable prevalence ranging between 0.49% and 4.78% in the 13 species reaching our threshold sample size of 59 individuals. Considering that within-species transmission in white-tailed deer resulted in raising the prevalence from 5% to 81% within a few months, this result would exclude a sustained cycle after spillback in the tested species.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Chiroptera , Deer , One Health , Animals , Humans , Animals, Wild , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/veterinary , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics
4.
Viruses ; 15(5)2023 05 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20236544

ABSTRACT

Since SARS-CoV-2 caused the COVID-19 pandemic, records have suggested the occurrence of reverse zoonosis of pets and farm animals in contact with SARS-CoV-2-positive humans in the Occident. However, there is little information on the spread of the virus among animals in contact with humans in Africa. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 in various animals in Nigeria. Overall, 791 animals from Ebonyi, Ogun, Ondo, and Oyo States, Nigeria were screened for SARS-CoV-2 using RT-qPCR (n = 364) and IgG ELISA (n = 654). SARS-CoV-2 positivity rates were 45.9% (RT-qPCR) and 1.4% (ELISA). SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in almost all animal taxa and sampling locations except Oyo State. SARS-CoV-2 IgGs were detected only in goats from Ebonyi and pigs from Ogun States. Overall, SARS-CoV-2 infectivity rates were higher in 2021 than in 2022. Our study highlights the ability of the virus to infect various animals. It presents the first report of natural SARS-CoV-2 infection in poultry, pigs, domestic ruminants, and lizards. The close human-animal interactions in these settings suggest ongoing reverse zoonosis, highlighting the role of behavioral factors of transmission and the potential for SARS-CoV-2 to spread among animals. These underscore the importance of continuous monitoring to detect and intervene in any eventual upsurge.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Animals , Humans , Swine , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Nigeria/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/veterinary , Pandemics , RNA, Viral/genetics , Zoonoses/epidemiology , Animals, Domestic , Goats
5.
Emerg Microbes Infect ; 12(1): 2220577, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20235192

ABSTRACT

SARS-CoV-2 has demonstrated the ability to infect a wide range of animal species. Here, we investigated SARS-CoV-2 infection in livestock species in Oman and provided serological evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cattle, sheep, goats, and dromedary camel using the surrogate virus neutralization and plaque reduction neutralization tests. To better understand the extent of SARS-CoV-2 infection in animals and associated risks, "One Health" epidemiological investigations targeting animals exposed to COVID-19 human cases should be implemented with integrated data analysis of the epidemiologically linked human and animal cases.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cattle , Humans , Animals , Sheep , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/veterinary , Oman/epidemiology , Camelus , SARS-CoV-2 , Data Analysis , Goats
6.
Med Mycol ; 61(6)2023 Jun 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20234417

ABSTRACT

The decision to use voriconazole for suspected COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) is based on clinical judgement weighed against concerns about its potential toxicity. We assessed the safety profile of voriconazole for patients with suspected CAPA by conducting a retrospective study of patients across two intensive care units. We compared changes in any liver enzymes or bilirubin and any new or increasing corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation following voriconazole use to patient baseline to indicate possible drug effect. In total, 48 patients with presumed CAPA treated with voriconazole were identified. Voriconazole therapy was administered for a median of 8 days (interquartile range [IQR] 5-22) and the median level was 1.86 mg/L (IQR 1.22-2.94). At baseline, 2% of patients had a hepatocellular injury profile, 54% had a cholestatic injury profile, and 21% had a mixed injury profile. There were no statistically significant changes in liver function tests over the first 7 days after voriconazole initiation. At day 28, there was a significant increase in alkaline phospahte only (81-122 U/L, P = 0.006), driven by changes in patients with baseline cholestatic injury. In contrast, patients with baseline hepatocellular or mixed injury had a significant decrease in alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase. Baseline QTc was 437 ms and remained unchanged after 7 days of voriconazole therapy even after sensitivity analysis for concomitantly administered QT prolonging agents. Therefore, at the doses used in this study, we did not detect evidence of significant liver or cardiac toxicity related to voriconazole use. Such information can be used to assist clinicians in the decision to initiate such treatment.


Our study did not show significant voriconazole-related liver or cardiac side effects in a critically ill cohort of patients with suspected COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis. These findings may allay specific clinician concerns when commencing therapy for such patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Aspergillosis , Animals , Voriconazole/adverse effects , Antifungal Agents/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Triazoles/adverse effects , COVID-19/veterinary , Pulmonary Aspergillosis/drug therapy , Pulmonary Aspergillosis/veterinary
7.
J Appl Lab Med ; 8(4): 726-741, 2023 07 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20231323

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, veterinary diagnostic laboratories have tested diagnostic samples for SARS-CoV-2 both in animals and over 6 million human samples. An evaluation of the performance of those laboratories is needed using blinded test samples to ensure that laboratories report reliable data to the public. This interlaboratory comparison exercise (ILC3) builds on 2 prior exercises to assess whether veterinary diagnostic laboratories can detect Delta and Omicron variants spiked in canine nasal matrix or viral transport medium. METHODS: The ILC organizer was an independent laboratory that prepared inactivated Delta variant at levels of 25 to 1000 copies per 50 µL of nasal matrix for blinded analysis. Omicron variant at 1000 copies per 50 µL of transport medium was also included. Feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV) RNA was used as a confounder for specificity assessment. Fourteen test samples were prepared for each participant. Participants used their routine diagnostic procedures for RNA extraction and real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR. Results were analyzed according to International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 16140-2:2016. RESULTS: Overall, laboratories demonstrated 93% detection for Delta and 97% for Omicron at 1000 copies per 50 µL. Specificity was 97% for blank samples and 100% for blank samples with FIPV. No differences in Cycle Threshold (Ct) values were significant for samples with the same virus levels between N1 and N2 markers, nor between the 2 variants. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that all ILC3 participants were able to detect both Delta and Omicron variants. The canine nasal matrix did not significantly affect SARS-CoV-2 detection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Cats , Humans , Animals , Dogs , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/veterinary , Laboratories , Pandemics , RNA , COVID-19 Testing
8.
Microbiol Spectr ; 11(3): e0255322, 2023 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20230845

ABSTRACT

The susceptibility of domestic cats to infection with SARS-CoV-2 has been demonstrated by several experimental studies and field observations. We performed an extensive study to further characterize the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 between cats, through both direct and indirect contact. To that end, we estimated the transmission rate parameter and the decay parameter for infectivity in the environment. Using four groups of pair-transmission experiment, all donor (inoculated) cats became infected, shed virus, and seroconverted, while three out of four direct contact cats got infected, shed virus, and two of those seroconverted. One out of eight cats exposed to a SARS-CoV-2-contaminated environment became infected but did not seroconvert. Statistical analysis of the transmission data gives a reproduction number R0 of 2.18 (95% CI = 0.92 to 4.08), a transmission rate parameter ß of 0.23 day-1 (95% CI = 0.06 to 0.54), and a virus decay rate parameter µ of 2.73 day-1 (95% CI = 0.77 to 15.82). These data indicate that transmission between cats is efficient and can be sustained (R0 > 1), however, the infectiousness of a contaminated environment decays rapidly (mean duration of infectiousness 1/2.73 days). Despite this, infections of cats via exposure to a SARS-CoV-2-contaminated environment cannot be discounted if cats are exposed shortly after contamination. IMPORTANCE This article provides additional insight into the risk of infection that could arise from cats infected with SARS-CoV-2 by using epidemiological models to determine transmission parameters. Considering that transmission parameters are not always provided in the literature describing transmission experiments in animals, we demonstrate that mathematical analysis of experimental data is crucial to estimate the likelihood of transmission. This article is also relevant to animal health professionals and authorities involved in risk assessments for zoonotic spill-overs of SARS-CoV-2. Last but not least, the mathematical models to calculate transmission parameters are applicable to analyze the experimental transmission of other pathogens between animals.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Animals , Cats , COVID-19/veterinary , Models, Theoretical , Risk Assessment
9.
PLoS One ; 18(5): e0285893, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2320026

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused the pandemic of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), resulting in a global lockdown in 2020. This stagnation in human activities ('anthropause') has been reported to affect the behaviour of wildlife in various ways. The sika deer Cervus nippon in Nara Park, central Japan, has had a unique relationship with humans, especially tourists, in which the deer bow to receive food and sometimes attack if they do not receive it. We investigated how a decrease and subsequent increase in the number of tourists visiting Nara Park affects the number of deer observed in the park and their behaviour (bows and attacks against humans). Compared with the pre-pandemic years, the number of deer in the study site decreased from an average of 167 deer in 2019 to 65 (39%) in 2020 during the pandemic period. Likewise, the number of deer bows decreased from 10.2 per deer in 2016-2017 to 6.4 (62%) in 2020-2021, whereas the proportion of deer showing aggressive behaviour did not change significantly. Moreover, the monthly numbers of deer and their bows both corresponded with the fluctuation in the number of tourists during the pandemic period of 2020 and 2021, whereas the number of attacks did not. Thus, the anthropause caused by the coronavirus altered the habitat use and behaviour of deer that have continuous interactions with humans.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Deer , Animals , Humans , Animals, Wild , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/veterinary , Communicable Disease Control , Human Activities , Japan/epidemiology
10.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 29(6): 1223-1227, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2320019

ABSTRACT

Anthropogenic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to pet cats highlights the importance of monitoring felids for exposure to circulating variants. We tested cats in the United Kingdom for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies; seroprevalence peaked during September 2021-February 2022. The variant-specific response in cats trailed circulating variants in humans, indicating multiple human-to-cat transmissions over a prolonged period.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Cats , Animals , Seroepidemiologic Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/veterinary , Antibodies, Viral , United Kingdom/epidemiology
11.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis ; 23(7): 397-400, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2317952

ABSTRACT

Background: Serological evidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has been reported in white-tailed deer (WTD) in the United States and Canada. Even though WTD are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, there is no evidence of infection by this virus in other mammalian species that might interact with WTD in nature. Similar to WTD, feral swine are widely distributed and generally occupy the same range as WTD in Texas. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody in WTD during 2020 and 2021 and determine the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody in feral swine during 2018 (prepandemic period) and from March 2020 to February 2021 (pandemic period) in Travis County, Texas. Materials and Methods: Sera samples were collected from hunter-killed WTD and feral swine during the prepandemic and pandemic period and tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibody by a plaque reduction neutralization assay in Vero cells. Results: SARS-CoV-2 antibody was not detected in any of the 166 feral swine sera samples, including 24 samples collected during the prepandemic and 142 samples collected during the pandemic period. Furthermore, SARS-CoV-2 antibody was not detected in the 115 WTD samples collected during late 2020, but antibody was detected in WTD in early 2021. Conclusions: The results indicated that SARS-CoV-2 infection of WTD occurred during early 2021 in Travis County, Texas, but serological evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was not detected in the feral swine samples collected from the same locality and during the same time period of the collection of WTD samples.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Deer , Swine Diseases , Chlorocebus aethiops , Animals , Swine , Texas/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Vero Cells , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/veterinary , Antibodies, Viral , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Swine Diseases/epidemiology
13.
Reprod Fertil ; 4(2)2023 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2316266

ABSTRACT

Abstract: Patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) may experience pain exacerbations requiring hospital admissions. Due to the effects of backlogged elective surgeries and outpatient gynaecology appointments resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, we hypothesised that there would be an increased number of women admitted with CPP flares. We conducted a retrospective review of all acute gynaecology admissions at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh from July to December 2018 (pre-COVID) and 2021 (post-COVID lockdown). We collected information on the proportion of emergency admissions due to CPP, inpatient investigations and subsequent management. Average total indicative hospital inpatient costs for women with CPP were calculated using NHS National Cost Collection data guidance. There was no significant difference in the number of emergency admissions due to pelvic pain before (153/507) and after (160/461) the COVID-19 pandemic. As high as 33 and 31% had a background history of CPP, respectively. Across both timepoints, investigations in women with CPP had low diagnostic yield: <25% had abnormal imaging findings and 0% had positive vaginal swab cultures. Women with CPP received significantly more inpatient morphine, pain team reviews and were more likely to be discharged with strong opioids. Total yearly inpatient costs were £170,104 and £179,156 in 2018 and 2021, respectively. Overall, emergency admission rates for managing CPP flares was similar before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Inpatient resource use for women with CPP remains high, investigations have low diagnostic yield and frequent instigation of opiates on discharge may risk dependence. Improved community care of CPP is needed to reduce emergency gynaecology resource utilisation. Lay summary: Existing treatments for chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and endometriosis focus on surgery or hormone medication, but these are often ineffective or associated with unacceptable side-effects. As a result, women continue to experience chronic pain and often have 'flares' of worsening pain that may lead to hospital admission. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in backlogged gynaecology clinics and surgeries. The aim of this study was to compare the management of emergency pelvic pain admissions for women with CPP before and after COVID-19. We also aimed to better understand their in-hospital management and estimate their hospital length of stay costs. We did not find an increase in CPP patients admitted for pelvic pain flares after the COVID-19 lockdown. Women with CPP often undergo multiple hospital tests and are often prescribed with strong pain medications which can cause long-term problems. Efforts are needed to improve long-term pain management for women with CPP.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Chronic Pain , Pelvic Pain , Animals , Female , Humans , Pandemics , Inpatients , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/veterinary , Communicable Disease Control , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Chronic Pain/therapy , Chronic Pain/veterinary , Pelvic Pain/epidemiology , Pelvic Pain/therapy , Pelvic Pain/etiology , Pelvic Pain/veterinary
14.
Vet Rec ; 192(9): 352-353, 2023 May 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2314993

ABSTRACT

Arabella Gray discusses recently unearthed genetic sequences that may point towards an animal origin for the Covid-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Animals , COVID-19/veterinary , Pandemics
15.
Viruses ; 15(4)2023 03 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2300058

ABSTRACT

On a global scale, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) poses a serious threat to the health of the human population. Not only humans can be infected, but also their companion animals. The antibody status of 115 cats and 170 dogs, originating from 177 German households known to have been SARS-CoV-2 positive, was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the results were combined with information gathered from a questionnaire that was completed by the owner(s) of the animals. The true seroprevalences of SARS-CoV-2 among cats and dogs were 42.5% (95% CI 33.5-51.9) and 56.8% (95% CI 49.1-64.4), respectively. In a multivariable logistic regression accounting for data clustered in households, for cats, the number of infected humans in the household and an above-average contact intensity turned out to be significant risk factors; contact with humans outside the household was a protective factor. For dogs, on the contrary, contact outside the household was a risk factor, and reduced contact, once the human infection was known, was a significant protective factor. No significant association was found between reported clinical signs in animals and their antibody status, and no spatial clustering of positive test results was identified.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cat Diseases , Animals , Cats , Dogs , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/veterinary , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibodies, Viral , Risk Factors , Germany/epidemiology , Cat Diseases/diagnosis , Cat Diseases/epidemiology
16.
Viruses ; 15(4)2023 04 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2298657

ABSTRACT

Following the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, cases of pets infected with variants circulating among humans were reported. In order to evaluate the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 circulation among pets in the Republic of the Congo, we conducted a ten-month study of dogs and cats living in COVID-19-positive households in Brazzaville and neighboring localities. Real-time PCR and the Luminex platform were used to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA and antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 RBD and S proteins, respectively. Our results show for the first time the simultaneous circulation of several variants of SARS-CoV-2, including viruses from clades 20A and 20H and a putative recombinant variant between viruses from clades 20B and 20H. We found a high seroprevalence of 38.6%, with 14% of tested pets positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Thirty-four percent of infected pets developed mild clinical signs, including respiratory and digestive signs, and shed the virus for about one day to two weeks. These results highlight the potential risk of SARS-CoV-2 interspecies transmission and the benefits of a "One Health" approach that includes SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis and surveillance of viral diversity in pets. This approach aims to prevent transmission to surrounding wildlife as well as spillback to humans.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cat Diseases , Dog Diseases , Animals , Cats , Dogs , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Congo/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/veterinary , COVID-19 Testing , Dog Diseases/diagnosis , Dog Diseases/epidemiology , RNA, Viral/genetics , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Recombination, Genetic
17.
J Am Vet Med Assoc ; 261(6): 789-797, 2023 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2297819

ABSTRACT

Contemporary human and animal viruses have a broad or narrow host range-those with a broad host range are potentially transmitted from animals to humans (ie, zoonosis) or humans to animals (ie, reverse zoonosis). This Currents in One Health article reviews the recent reverse zoonoses involving Coronaviridae, Poxviridae, arboviruses, and, for nonhuman primate species, the human respiratory viruses. The prevention and control of reverse zoonoses are also reviewed. Coronaviruses continue to emerge as new zoonotic agents, including a canine coronavirus, CCoV-HuPn-2018, circulating in people at low levels, and a pangolin coronavirus, MjHKU4r-CoV-1, circulating in Malayan pangolins. Moreover, the risk for SARS-CoV-2 variants to mutate in animal reservoirs and reinfect humans is ongoing. In the case of mpox, the risk of reverse zoonosis is low and there are vaccines for use in humans at risk. The situation with arboviruses is as varied as the number of human arboviruses, and only yellow fever virus and dengue virus have licensed vaccines in the Americas. As for reverse zoonoses in endangered species, solutions require changing human behavior and policies at all levels impacting wildlife. Overall, continuous surveillance and viral discovery in humans and animals remain core components of a one-health approach to reduce and, where possible, eliminate zoonotic and reverse zoonotic diseases. Viral zoonosis and viral reverse zoonosis focusing on recent influenza A virus disease events in humans and other species are the subjects of the companion Currents in One Health by Kibenge, AJVR, June 2023.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , One Health , Humans , Animals , SARS-CoV-2 , Viral Zoonoses , COVID-19/veterinary , Zoonoses/prevention & control , Animals, Wild
18.
Zoonoses Public Health ; 70(5): 393-402, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2297270

ABSTRACT

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in bacterial pathogens reduces the effectiveness of these drugs in both human and veterinary medicine, making judicious antimicrobial use (AMU) an important strategy for its control. The COVID-19 pandemic modified operations in both human and veterinary healthcare delivery, potentially impacting AMU. The goal of this research is to quantify how antimicrobial drug prescribing practices for companion animals in an academic veterinary hospital changed during the pandemic. A retrospective study was performed using prescribing data for dogs and cats collected from the NC State College of Veterinary Medicine (NCSU-CVM) pharmacy, which included prescriptions from both the specialty referral hospital and primary care services. Records (n = 31,769) for 34 antimicrobial drugs from 2019-2020-before and during the pandemic-related measures at the NCSU-CVM-were compared. The prescribed antimicrobials' importance was categorized using the FDA's Guidance for Industry (GFI #152), classifying drugs according to medical importance in humans. A proportional odds model was used to estimate the probability of more important antimicrobials being administered in patients seen during the pandemic versus before (i.e., critically important vs. highly important vs. important). Rates of AMU per week and per patient visit were also compared. During the pandemic, cumulative antimicrobials prescribed per week were significantly decreased in most services for dogs. Weekly rates for Highly Important antimicrobials were also significantly lower in dogs. For important and critically important antimicrobials, rates per week were significantly decreased in various services overall. Rates of antimicrobial administration per patient visit were significantly increased for Highly Important drugs. Patients in the internal medicine, dermatology, and surgery services received significantly more important antimicrobials during the pandemic than before, while cardiology patients received significantly less. These results suggest that the pandemic significantly impacted prescribing practices of antimicrobials for companion animals in this study.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , COVID-19 , Cat Diseases , Dog Diseases , Humans , Cats , Animals , Dogs , Pets , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Hospitals, Animal , North Carolina , Dog Diseases/drug therapy , Dog Diseases/epidemiology , COVID-19/veterinary , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
19.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 29(6): 1102-1108, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2303762

ABSTRACT

We describe animal-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in a zoo setting in Indiana, USA. A vaccinated African lion with physical limitations requiring hand feeding tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 after onset of respiratory signs. Zoo employees were screened, monitored prospectively for onset of symptoms, then rescreened as indicated; results were confirmed by using reverse transcription PCR and whole-genome virus sequencing when possible. Traceback investigation narrowed the source of infection to 1 of 6 persons. Three exposed employees subsequently had onset of symptoms, 2 with viral genomes identical to the lion's. Forward contact tracing investigation confirmed probable lion-to-human transmission. Close contact with large cats is a risk factor for bidirectional zoonotic SARS-CoV-2 transmission that should be considered when occupational health and biosecurity practices at zoos are designed and implemented. SARS-CoV-2 rapid testing and detection methods for big cats and other susceptible animals should be developed and validated to enable timely implementation of One Health investigations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lions , Animals , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19/veterinary , Indiana/epidemiology , Contact Tracing
20.
Euro Surveill ; 28(16)2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2294368

ABSTRACT

In late 2022 and early 2023, SARS-CoV-2 infections were detected on three mink farms in Poland situated within a few km from each other. Whole-genome sequencing of the viruses on two of the farms showed that they were related to a virus identified in humans in the same region 2 years before (B.1.1.307 lineage). Many mutations were found, including in the S protein typical of adaptations to the mink host. The origin of the virus remains to be determined.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disease Reservoirs , Mink , SARS-CoV-2 , Animals , Humans , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/veterinary , Farms , Mink/virology , Poland/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Disease Reservoirs/veterinary , Disease Reservoirs/virology , Mutation , Whole Genome Sequencing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL